維基百科:仲裁/請求
![本頁使用了標題或全文手工轉換](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cd/Zh_conversion_icon_m.svg/35px-Zh_conversion_icon_m.svg.png)
仲裁是維基百科解決行為爭議的最終手段。仲裁委員會負責在仲裁方針框架下審理立案及複審請求。
請至/請求/執行子頁面請求執行過往仲裁決定,請勿為此提交立案請求。
請在適當位置發起請求
- 請求仲裁立案
- 請求澄清及修正過往案件
- 包括請求撤銷過往實施的制裁措施
- 請求執行過往案件決定的措施
- 仲裁員動議
- 仲裁員發起的動議,非針對當前進行中的案件
關於本頁 任何註冊用戶可使用本章節請求仲裁委員會立案審理用戶行為不當事件,須獲淨正三票或絕對多數仲裁員同意才得立案。 仲裁是最終爭議解決措施。指引列出其他解決爭議的渠道,未充分經過其他渠道嘗試解決爭議的案件可能不獲受理。 發起仲裁前,請先閲讀仲裁委員會的發起仲裁指導。點擊下方按鈕即可開始填寫發起仲裁請求表單,請根據指示填寫。發佈在立案請求頁逾一小時的未完成請求草稿將被移除,建議提前在用戶頁沙盒準備材料。 若要請求執行現有仲裁裁決,請至仲裁執行請求。若要澄清或修正現有仲裁裁決,請至仲裁澄清與修正請求。
參與指南 本頁與維基百科上的許多頁面不一樣有著更為嚴格的限制,請遵守以下有關遵守字數限制的注意事項。
常規指南
|
用戶討論頁重排他人留言的爭議
[編輯]- 該仲裁立案請求由自由雨日🌧️❄️(User:自由雨日)於2025年2月12日 (三) 17:19 (UTC)發起。
擬議各方
[編輯]- 自由雨日 (討論 · 貢獻 · 刪除貢獻 · 日誌 · 過濾器日誌 · 封禁 · 封禁日誌) – 發起人
- ZhaoFJx (討論 · 貢獻 · 刪除貢獻 · 日誌 · 過濾器日誌 · 封禁 · 封禁日誌)
- 確認已通知擬議各方
- 確認各方已嘗試爭議解決指引的步驟
- 「UT:ZhaoFJx」的修訂歷史
- WP:管理員布告板/編輯爭議#ZhaoFJx
- Telegram多個群的多次溝通
自由雨日的陳述
[編輯]在該筆編輯中,ZhaoFJx移動了我的留言,並為我的留言加上標題,我認為這已經違反了討論頁指引(此前類似案例可見U:Bluedeck/etc/sandbox/box1514997674514中的Q16,以及WP:管理員布告板/其他不當行為/存檔/2024年10月#Chinuan12623)。通常對這樣的編輯我會直接回退,但出於對ZhaoFJx的尊重,我決定讓留言維持在他希望的樣子——但不能錯誤表達我留言的原意(我並未加入標題,以及我原留言的位置並非如此——因為我是緊跟在其編輯的模板後所做的留言),所以我增加了頂注說明標題並非自己所寫、增加了移動模板。對頂注,ZhaoFJx表示了默許,但卻刪除了我加的模板。隨後在編輯爭議布告板,在Telegram多個群的多次溝通中,ZhaoFJx都堅持將討論頁留言維持在其修改後的版本,且拒絕我加入的說明模板。由於AN3布告板我ping的用戶均表示拒絕參與討論或未回應,且已多日無人留言,我預期布告板將無法解決該問題,故提請仲裁。
這一問題本身並非大問題——但第一、我希望明確①ZhaoFJx該筆編輯是否合適,以及②我的1、2兩個操作是否合適(以及③我假設中的「不尊重ZhaoFJx」的編輯——即直接回退ZhaoFJx的編輯——是否合適),這關係到我最近正在起草的中維新版討論頁指引(僅打算起草完善「修改留言」章節),我需要應根據案例來調整起草內容。第二、ZhaoFJx此前也有一次莫名修改我加的(同其沒有任何關係的){{移動至}}{{移動自}}模板(更動的內容中包括了我的簽名),且拒絕我改回,在當時整個爭議中ZhaoFJx甚至違反了3RR(第4次回退是對我在同頁面的留言),最後Sanmosa指出我們對「移動」模板的sign參數填寫均不合適(詳見WP:管理員布告板/其他不當行為/存檔/2025年1月#ZhaoFJx)——也就是說,ZhaoFJx並非根據相關共識修正我的編輯,而是用編輯戰的方式強推其自己的做法——如果本次ZhaoFJx編輯我的留言且用編輯戰方式拒絕我加入模板說明的做法被認為不合適(不論我的做法是否完全合適,因為重點在其並非根據共識的多次「強推」),我認為需要單向互動禁制ZhaoFJx此後更動我在討論頁做出的編輯。--此條未正確簽名的留言由自由雨日(討論|貢獻)於2025年2月12日 (三) 20:15 (UTC)加入。
ZhaoFJx的陳述
[編輯]未涉事維基人的意見
[編輯]未涉事用戶名的意見
[編輯]非案件擬議各方的用戶被稱為「未涉事用戶」,其可以發表個人意見,惟仍需遵守頁面所列的仲裁指南。此外,仲裁立案發言區僅用作向仲裁委員會陳情,請簡潔提出陳述,請勿在此討論、辯論或單純評論回應他人。留言內容應簡潔扼要,並減少使用會導致低可讀性和版面混亂的(如字號大小、字體顏色)的格式。
應按照以下格式,在本章節上方,其他用戶章節和標題下方插入意見:
==== {您的用户名}的意見 ====
个人意见。——~~~~
LuciferianThomas的意見
[編輯]事件提報至AN3才一週,沒人討論不等於解決無效;且這也涉及方針指引詮釋問題,發起人也未曾嘗試向廣泛社群徵詢關於有關方針指引如何詮釋,不認為此案已窮極所有解決爭議的途徑,以至需要動用仲裁。個人認為仲裁委員會應考慮拒絕此立案請求。——路西法人 2025年2月13日 (四) 06:05 (UTC)
簡要描述案件:仲裁員對案件的意見(0/1/1)
[編輯]註記:(同意/拒絕/規避)
仲裁員注意
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
- 我本身參與有關爭議,故迴避,煩請其他仲裁員關注。——敬頌冬綏 ZhaoFJx(論•簽) 2025年2月13日 (四) 00:54 (UTC)
- 同LuciferianThomas,此案件明顯不符合爭議解決指引的需求,而且我認為此案的重點比起「用戶間的爭議」更像是「對於方針的不同理解」,而後者顯然仲裁委員會沒有決定權。--人間百態,獨尊變態(討論)(簽名) 2025年2月13日 (四) 10:30 (UTC)
Click here to add a new enforcement request
For appeals: create a new section and use the template {{Arbitration enforcement appeal}}
See also: Logged AE sanctions
![]() | Important information Please use this page only to:
For all other problems, including content disagreements or the enforcement of community-imposed sanctions, please use the other fora described in the dispute resolution process. To appeal Arbitration Committee decisions, please use the clarification and amendment noticeboard. Only autoconfirmed users may file enforcement requests here; requests filed by IPs or accounts less than four days old or with less than 10 edits will be removed. All users are welcome to comment on requests except where doing so would violate an active restriction (such as an extended-confirmed restriction). If you make an enforcement request or comment on a request, your own conduct may be examined as well, and you may be sanctioned for it. Enforcement requests and statements in response to them may not exceed 500 words and 20 diffs, except by permission of a reviewing administrator. (Word Count Tool) Statements must be made in separate sections. Non-compliant contributions may be removed or shortened by administrators. Disruptive contributions such as personal attacks, or groundless or vexatious complaints, may result in blocks or other sanctions. To make an enforcement request, click on the link above this box and supply all required information. Incomplete requests may be ignored. Requests reporting diffs older than one week may be declined as stale. To appeal a contentious topic restriction or other enforcement decision, please create a new section and use the template {{Arbitration enforcement appeal}}.
|
Template:Arbitration enforcement/Archive navbox
Use this section to request clarification or amendment of a closed Arbitration Committee case or decision.
- Requests for clarification are used to ask for further guidance or clarification about an existing completed Arbitration Committee case or decision.
- Requests for amendment are used to ask for an amendment or extension of existing sanctions (for instance, because the sanctions are ineffective, contain a loophole, or no longer cover a sufficiently wide topic); or appeal for the removal of sanctions (including bans).
Submitting a request: (you must use this format!)
- Choose one of the following options and open the page in a new tab or window:
- Click here to file a request for clarification of an arbitration decision or procedure.
- Click here to file a request for amendment of an arbitration decision or procedure (including an arbitration enforcement action issued by an administrator, such as a contentious topics restriction).
- Click here to file a referral from AE requesting enforcement of a decision.
- Click here to file a referral from AE appealing an arbitration enforcement action.
- Save your request and check that it looks how you think it should and says what you intended.
- If your request will affect or involve other users (including any users you have named as parties), you must notify these editors of your submission; you can use
{{subst:Arbitration CA notice|SECTIONTITLE}}
to do this. - Add the diffs of the talk page notifications under the applicable header of the request.
Please do not submit your request until it is ready for consideration; this is not a space for drafts, and incremental additions to a submission are disruptive.
Guidance on participation and word limits
Unlike many venues on Wikipedia, ArbCom imposes word limits. Please observe the below notes on complying with word limits.
- Motivation. Word limits are imposed to promote clarity and focus on the issues at hand and to ensure that arbitrators are able to fully take in submissions. Arbitrators must read a large volume of information across many matters in the course of their service on the Committee, so submissions that exceed word limits may be disregarded. For the sake of fairness and to discourage gamesmanship (i.e., to disincentivize "asking forgiveness rather than permission"), word limits are actively enforced.
- In general. Most submissions to the Arbitration Committee (including statements in arbitration case requests and ARCAs and evidence submissions in arbitration cases) are limited to 500 words, plus 50 diffs. During the evidence phase of an accepted case, named parties are granted an automatic extension to 1000 words plus 100 diffs.
- Sectioned discussion. To facilitate review by arbitrators, you should edit only in your own section. Address your submission to arbitrators, not to other participants. If you wish to rebut, clarify, or otherwise refer to another submission for the benefit of arbitrators, you may do so within your own section. (More information.)
- Requesting an extension. You may request a word limit extension in your submission itself (using the {{@ArbComClerks}} template) or by emailing Template:Clerks-l. In your request, you should briefly (in 1-2 sentences) include (a) why you need additional words and (b) a broad outline of what you hope to discuss in your extended submission. The Committee endeavors to act upon extension requests promptly and aims to offer flexibility where warranted.
- Members of the Committee may also grant extensions when they ask direct questions to facilitate answers to those questions.
- Refactoring statements. You should write carefully and concisely from the start. It is impermissible to rewrite a statement to shorten it after a significant amount of time has passed or after anyone has responded to it (see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines § Editing own comments), so it is often advisable to submit a brief initial statement to leave room to respond to other users if the need arises.
- Sign submissions. In order for arbitrators and other participants to understand the order of submissions, sign your submission and each addition (using
~~~~
). - Word limit violations. Submissions that exceed the word limit will generally be "hatted" (collapsed), and arbitrators may opt not to consider them.
- Counting words. Words are counted on the rendered text (not wikitext) of the statement (i.e., the number of words that you would see by copy-pasting the page section containing your statement into a text editor or word count tool). This internal gadget may also be helpful.
- Sanctions. Please note that members and clerks of the Committee may impose appropriate sanctions when necessary to promote the effective functioning of the arbitration process.
General guidance
- Arbitrators and clerks may summarily remove or refactor discussion without comment.
- Requests from blocked or banned users should be made by e-mail directly to the Arbitration Committee.
- Only arbitrators and clerks may remove requests from this page. Do not remove a request or any statements or comments unless you are in either of these groups.
- Archived clarification and amendment requests are logged at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Index/Clarification and Amendment requests. Numerous legacy and current shortcuts can be used to more quickly reach this page:
![]() | 此章節可供仲裁委員提出與任何現有案件或請求無關的動議。動議將被存檔於Wikipedia:仲裁/請求/動議/存檔。 注意:只有仲裁委員可以在本頁提出動議或參與投票。 您可以在「社群討論」的部分發表評論,或者在某些情況下僅限於您自己的段落中發表意見。仲裁委員可以刪除或重構任何評論。 |
Click here to add a new enforcement request
For appeals: create a new section and use the template {{Arbitration enforcement appeal}}
See also: Logged AE sanctions
![]() | Important information Please use this page only to:
For all other problems, including content disagreements or the enforcement of community-imposed sanctions, please use the other fora described in the dispute resolution process. To appeal Arbitration Committee decisions, please use the clarification and amendment noticeboard. Only autoconfirmed users may file enforcement requests here; requests filed by IPs or accounts less than four days old or with less than 10 edits will be removed. All users are welcome to comment on requests except where doing so would violate an active restriction (such as an extended-confirmed restriction). If you make an enforcement request or comment on a request, your own conduct may be examined as well, and you may be sanctioned for it. Enforcement requests and statements in response to them may not exceed 500 words and 20 diffs, except by permission of a reviewing administrator. (Word Count Tool) Statements must be made in separate sections. Non-compliant contributions may be removed or shortened by administrators. Disruptive contributions such as personal attacks, or groundless or vexatious complaints, may result in blocks or other sanctions. To make an enforcement request, click on the link above this box and supply all required information. Incomplete requests may be ignored. Requests reporting diffs older than one week may be declined as stale. To appeal a contentious topic restriction or other enforcement decision, please create a new section and use the template {{Arbitration enforcement appeal}}.
|
Template:Arbitration enforcement/Archive navbox
Use this section to request clarification or amendment of a closed Arbitration Committee case or decision.
- Requests for clarification are used to ask for further guidance or clarification about an existing completed Arbitration Committee case or decision.
- Requests for amendment are used to ask for an amendment or extension of existing sanctions (for instance, because the sanctions are ineffective, contain a loophole, or no longer cover a sufficiently wide topic); or appeal for the removal of sanctions (including bans).
Submitting a request: (you must use this format!)
- Choose one of the following options and open the page in a new tab or window:
- Click here to file a request for clarification of an arbitration decision or procedure.
- Click here to file a request for amendment of an arbitration decision or procedure (including an arbitration enforcement action issued by an administrator, such as a contentious topics restriction).
- Click here to file a referral from AE requesting enforcement of a decision.
- Click here to file a referral from AE appealing an arbitration enforcement action.
- Save your request and check that it looks how you think it should and says what you intended.
- If your request will affect or involve other users (including any users you have named as parties), you must notify these editors of your submission; you can use
{{subst:Arbitration CA notice|SECTIONTITLE}}
to do this. - Add the diffs of the talk page notifications under the applicable header of the request.
Please do not submit your request until it is ready for consideration; this is not a space for drafts, and incremental additions to a submission are disruptive.
Guidance on participation and word limits
Unlike many venues on Wikipedia, ArbCom imposes word limits. Please observe the below notes on complying with word limits.
- Motivation. Word limits are imposed to promote clarity and focus on the issues at hand and to ensure that arbitrators are able to fully take in submissions. Arbitrators must read a large volume of information across many matters in the course of their service on the Committee, so submissions that exceed word limits may be disregarded. For the sake of fairness and to discourage gamesmanship (i.e., to disincentivize "asking forgiveness rather than permission"), word limits are actively enforced.
- In general. Most submissions to the Arbitration Committee (including statements in arbitration case requests and ARCAs and evidence submissions in arbitration cases) are limited to 500 words, plus 50 diffs. During the evidence phase of an accepted case, named parties are granted an automatic extension to 1000 words plus 100 diffs.
- Sectioned discussion. To facilitate review by arbitrators, you should edit only in your own section. Address your submission to arbitrators, not to other participants. If you wish to rebut, clarify, or otherwise refer to another submission for the benefit of arbitrators, you may do so within your own section. (More information.)
- Requesting an extension. You may request a word limit extension in your submission itself (using the {{@ArbComClerks}} template) or by emailing Template:Clerks-l. In your request, you should briefly (in 1-2 sentences) include (a) why you need additional words and (b) a broad outline of what you hope to discuss in your extended submission. The Committee endeavors to act upon extension requests promptly and aims to offer flexibility where warranted.
- Members of the Committee may also grant extensions when they ask direct questions to facilitate answers to those questions.
- Refactoring statements. You should write carefully and concisely from the start. It is impermissible to rewrite a statement to shorten it after a significant amount of time has passed or after anyone has responded to it (see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines § Editing own comments), so it is often advisable to submit a brief initial statement to leave room to respond to other users if the need arises.
- Sign submissions. In order for arbitrators and other participants to understand the order of submissions, sign your submission and each addition (using
~~~~
). - Word limit violations. Submissions that exceed the word limit will generally be "hatted" (collapsed), and arbitrators may opt not to consider them.
- Counting words. Words are counted on the rendered text (not wikitext) of the statement (i.e., the number of words that you would see by copy-pasting the page section containing your statement into a text editor or word count tool). This internal gadget may also be helpful.
- Sanctions. Please note that members and clerks of the Committee may impose appropriate sanctions when necessary to promote the effective functioning of the arbitration process.
General guidance
- Arbitrators and clerks may summarily remove or refactor discussion without comment.
- Requests from blocked or banned users should be made by e-mail directly to the Arbitration Committee.
- Only arbitrators and clerks may remove requests from this page. Do not remove a request or any statements or comments unless you are in either of these groups.
- Archived clarification and amendment requests are logged at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Index/Clarification and Amendment requests. Numerous legacy and current shortcuts can be used to more quickly reach this page: