维基百科:仲裁/请求
![本页使用了标题或全文手工转换](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cd/Zh_conversion_icon_m.svg/35px-Zh_conversion_icon_m.svg.png)
仲裁是维基百科解决行为争议的最终手段。仲裁委员会负责在仲裁方针框架下审理立案及复审请求。
请至/请求/执行子页面请求执行过往仲裁决定,请勿为此提交立案请求。
请在适当位置发起请求
- 请求仲裁立案
- 请求澄清及修正过往案件
- 包括请求撤销过往实施的制裁措施
- 请求执行过往案件决定的措施
- 仲裁员动议
- 仲裁员发起的动议,非针对当前进行中的案件
关于本页 任何注册用户可使用本章节请求仲裁委员会立案审理用户行为不当事件,须获净正三票或绝对多数仲裁员同意才得立案。 仲裁是最终争议解决措施。指引列出其他解决争议的渠道,未充分经过其他渠道尝试解决争议的案件可能不获受理。 发起仲裁前,请先阅读仲裁委员会的发起仲裁指导。点击下方按钮即可开始填写发起仲裁请求表单,请根据指示填写。发布在立案请求页逾一小时的未完成请求草稿将被移除,建议提前在用户页沙盒准备材料。 若要请求执行现有仲裁裁决,请至仲裁执行请求。若要澄清或修正现有仲裁裁决,请至仲裁澄清与修正请求。
参与指南 本页与维基百科上的许多页面不一样有著更为严格的限制,请遵守以下有关遵守字数限制的注意事项。
常规指南
|
用户讨论页重排他人留言的争议
[编辑]- 该仲裁立案请求由自由雨日🌧️❄️(User:自由雨日)于2025年2月12日 (三) 17:19 (UTC)发起。
拟议各方
[编辑]- 自由雨日 (讨论 · 贡献 · 删除贡献 · 日志 · 过滤器日志 · 封禁 · 封禁日志) – 发起人
- ZhaoFJx (讨论 · 贡献 · 删除贡献 · 日志 · 过滤器日志 · 封禁 · 封禁日志)
- 确认已通知拟议各方
- 确认各方已尝试争议解决指引的步骤
- “UT:ZhaoFJx”的修订历史
- WP:管理员布告板/编辑争议#ZhaoFJx
- Telegram多个群的多次沟通
自由雨日的陈述
[编辑]在该笔编辑中,ZhaoFJx移动了我的留言,并为我的留言加上标题,我认为这已经违反了讨论页指引(此前类似案例可见U:Bluedeck/etc/sandbox/box1514997674514中的Q16,以及WP:管理员布告板/其他不当行为/存档/2024年10月#Chinuan12623)。通常对这样的编辑我会直接回退,但出于对ZhaoFJx的尊重,我决定让留言维持在他希望的样子——但不能错误表达我留言的原意(我并未加入标题,以及我原留言的位置并非如此——因为我是紧跟在其编辑的模板后所做的留言),所以我增加了顶注说明标题并非自己所写、增加了移动模板。对顶注,ZhaoFJx表示了默许,但却删除了我加的模板。随后在编辑争议布告板,在Telegram多个群的多次沟通中,ZhaoFJx都坚持将讨论页留言维持在其修改后的版本,且拒绝我加入的说明模板。由于AN3布告板我ping的用户均表示拒绝参与讨论或未回应,且已多日无人留言,我预期布告板将无法解决该问题,故提请仲裁。
这一问题本身并非大问题——但第一、我希望明确①ZhaoFJx该笔编辑是否合适,以及②我的1、2两个操作是否合适(以及③我假设中的“不尊重ZhaoFJx”的编辑——即直接回退ZhaoFJx的编辑——是否合适),这关系到我最近正在起草的中维新版讨论页指引(仅打算起草完善“修改留言”章节),我需要应根据案例来调整起草内容。第二、ZhaoFJx此前也有一次莫名修改我加的(同其没有任何关系的){{移动至}}{{移动自}}模板(更动的内容中包括了我的签名),且拒绝我改回,在当时整个争议中ZhaoFJx甚至违反了3RR(第4次回退是对我在同页面的留言),最后Sanmosa指出我们对“移动”模板的sign参数填写均不合适(详见WP:管理员布告板/其他不当行为/存档/2025年1月#ZhaoFJx)——也就是说,ZhaoFJx并非根据相关共识修正我的编辑,而是用编辑战的方式强推其自己的做法——如果本次ZhaoFJx编辑我的留言且用编辑战方式拒绝我加入模板说明的做法被认为不合适(不论我的做法是否完全合适,因为重点在其并非根据共识的多次“强推”),我认为需要单向互动禁制ZhaoFJx此后更动我在讨论页做出的编辑。--此条未正确签名的留言由自由雨日(讨论|贡献)于2025年2月12日 (三) 20:15 (UTC)加入。
ZhaoFJx的陈述
[编辑]未涉事维基人的意见
[编辑]未涉事用户名的意见
[编辑]非案件拟议各方的用户被称为“未涉事用户”,其可以发表个人意见,惟仍需遵守页面所列的仲裁指南。此外,仲裁立案发言区仅用作向仲裁委员会陈情,请简洁提出陈述,请勿在此讨论、辩论或单纯评论回应他人。留言内容应简洁扼要,并减少使用会导致低可读性和版面混乱的(如字号大小、字体颜色)的格式。
应按照以下格式,在本章节上方,其他用户章节和标题下方插入意见:
==== {您的用户名}的意見 ====
个人意见。——~~~~
LuciferianThomas的意见
[编辑]事件提报至AN3才一周,没人讨论不等于解决无效;且这也涉及方针指引诠释问题,发起人也未曾尝试向广泛社群征询关于有关方针指引如何诠释,不认为此案已穷极所有解决争议的途径,以至需要动用仲裁。个人认为仲裁委员会应考虑拒绝此立案请求。——路西法人 2025年2月13日 (四) 06:05 (UTC)
简要描述案件:仲裁员对案件的意见(0/1/1)
[编辑]注记:(同意/拒绝/规避)
仲裁员注意
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
- 我本身参与有关争议,故回避,烦请其他仲裁员关注。——敬颂冬绥 ZhaoFJx(论•签) 2025年2月13日 (四) 00:54 (UTC)
- 同LuciferianThomas,此案件明显不符合争议解决指引的需求,而且我认为此案的重点比起“用户间的争议”更像是“对于方针的不同理解”,而后者显然仲裁委员会没有决定权。--人间百态,独尊变态(讨论)(签名) 2025年2月13日 (四) 10:30 (UTC)
Click here to add a new enforcement request
For appeals: create a new section and use the template {{Arbitration enforcement appeal}}
See also: Logged AE sanctions
![]() | Important information Please use this page only to:
For all other problems, including content disagreements or the enforcement of community-imposed sanctions, please use the other fora described in the dispute resolution process. To appeal Arbitration Committee decisions, please use the clarification and amendment noticeboard. Only autoconfirmed users may file enforcement requests here; requests filed by IPs or accounts less than four days old or with less than 10 edits will be removed. All users are welcome to comment on requests except where doing so would violate an active restriction (such as an extended-confirmed restriction). If you make an enforcement request or comment on a request, your own conduct may be examined as well, and you may be sanctioned for it. Enforcement requests and statements in response to them may not exceed 500 words and 20 diffs, except by permission of a reviewing administrator. (Word Count Tool) Statements must be made in separate sections. Non-compliant contributions may be removed or shortened by administrators. Disruptive contributions such as personal attacks, or groundless or vexatious complaints, may result in blocks or other sanctions. To make an enforcement request, click on the link above this box and supply all required information. Incomplete requests may be ignored. Requests reporting diffs older than one week may be declined as stale. To appeal a contentious topic restriction or other enforcement decision, please create a new section and use the template {{Arbitration enforcement appeal}}.
|
Template:Arbitration enforcement/Archive navbox
Use this section to request clarification or amendment of a closed Arbitration Committee case or decision.
- Requests for clarification are used to ask for further guidance or clarification about an existing completed Arbitration Committee case or decision.
- Requests for amendment are used to ask for an amendment or extension of existing sanctions (for instance, because the sanctions are ineffective, contain a loophole, or no longer cover a sufficiently wide topic); or appeal for the removal of sanctions (including bans).
Submitting a request: (you must use this format!)
- Choose one of the following options and open the page in a new tab or window:
- Click here to file a request for clarification of an arbitration decision or procedure.
- Click here to file a request for amendment of an arbitration decision or procedure (including an arbitration enforcement action issued by an administrator, such as a contentious topics restriction).
- Click here to file a referral from AE requesting enforcement of a decision.
- Click here to file a referral from AE appealing an arbitration enforcement action.
- Save your request and check that it looks how you think it should and says what you intended.
- If your request will affect or involve other users (including any users you have named as parties), you must notify these editors of your submission; you can use
{{subst:Arbitration CA notice|SECTIONTITLE}}
to do this. - Add the diffs of the talk page notifications under the applicable header of the request.
Please do not submit your request until it is ready for consideration; this is not a space for drafts, and incremental additions to a submission are disruptive.
Guidance on participation and word limits
Unlike many venues on Wikipedia, ArbCom imposes word limits. Please observe the below notes on complying with word limits.
- Motivation. Word limits are imposed to promote clarity and focus on the issues at hand and to ensure that arbitrators are able to fully take in submissions. Arbitrators must read a large volume of information across many matters in the course of their service on the Committee, so submissions that exceed word limits may be disregarded. For the sake of fairness and to discourage gamesmanship (i.e., to disincentivize "asking forgiveness rather than permission"), word limits are actively enforced.
- In general. Most submissions to the Arbitration Committee (including statements in arbitration case requests and ARCAs and evidence submissions in arbitration cases) are limited to 500 words, plus 50 diffs. During the evidence phase of an accepted case, named parties are granted an automatic extension to 1000 words plus 100 diffs.
- Sectioned discussion. To facilitate review by arbitrators, you should edit only in your own section. Address your submission to arbitrators, not to other participants. If you wish to rebut, clarify, or otherwise refer to another submission for the benefit of arbitrators, you may do so within your own section. (More information.)
- Requesting an extension. You may request a word limit extension in your submission itself (using the {{@ArbComClerks}} template) or by emailing Template:Clerks-l. In your request, you should briefly (in 1-2 sentences) include (a) why you need additional words and (b) a broad outline of what you hope to discuss in your extended submission. The Committee endeavors to act upon extension requests promptly and aims to offer flexibility where warranted.
- Members of the Committee may also grant extensions when they ask direct questions to facilitate answers to those questions.
- Refactoring statements. You should write carefully and concisely from the start. It is impermissible to rewrite a statement to shorten it after a significant amount of time has passed or after anyone has responded to it (see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines § Editing own comments), so it is often advisable to submit a brief initial statement to leave room to respond to other users if the need arises.
- Sign submissions. In order for arbitrators and other participants to understand the order of submissions, sign your submission and each addition (using
~~~~
). - Word limit violations. Submissions that exceed the word limit will generally be "hatted" (collapsed), and arbitrators may opt not to consider them.
- Counting words. Words are counted on the rendered text (not wikitext) of the statement (i.e., the number of words that you would see by copy-pasting the page section containing your statement into a text editor or word count tool). This internal gadget may also be helpful.
- Sanctions. Please note that members and clerks of the Committee may impose appropriate sanctions when necessary to promote the effective functioning of the arbitration process.
General guidance
- Arbitrators and clerks may summarily remove or refactor discussion without comment.
- Requests from blocked or banned users should be made by e-mail directly to the Arbitration Committee.
- Only arbitrators and clerks may remove requests from this page. Do not remove a request or any statements or comments unless you are in either of these groups.
- Archived clarification and amendment requests are logged at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Index/Clarification and Amendment requests. Numerous legacy and current shortcuts can be used to more quickly reach this page:
![]() | 此章节可供仲裁委员提出与任何现有案件或请求无关的动议。动议将被存档于Wikipedia:仲裁/请求/动议/存档。 注意:只有仲裁委员可以在本页提出动议或参与投票。 您可以在“社群讨论”的部分发表评论,或者在某些情况下仅限于您自己的段落中发表意见。仲裁委员可以删除或重构任何评论。 |
Click here to add a new enforcement request
For appeals: create a new section and use the template {{Arbitration enforcement appeal}}
See also: Logged AE sanctions
![]() | Important information Please use this page only to:
For all other problems, including content disagreements or the enforcement of community-imposed sanctions, please use the other fora described in the dispute resolution process. To appeal Arbitration Committee decisions, please use the clarification and amendment noticeboard. Only autoconfirmed users may file enforcement requests here; requests filed by IPs or accounts less than four days old or with less than 10 edits will be removed. All users are welcome to comment on requests except where doing so would violate an active restriction (such as an extended-confirmed restriction). If you make an enforcement request or comment on a request, your own conduct may be examined as well, and you may be sanctioned for it. Enforcement requests and statements in response to them may not exceed 500 words and 20 diffs, except by permission of a reviewing administrator. (Word Count Tool) Statements must be made in separate sections. Non-compliant contributions may be removed or shortened by administrators. Disruptive contributions such as personal attacks, or groundless or vexatious complaints, may result in blocks or other sanctions. To make an enforcement request, click on the link above this box and supply all required information. Incomplete requests may be ignored. Requests reporting diffs older than one week may be declined as stale. To appeal a contentious topic restriction or other enforcement decision, please create a new section and use the template {{Arbitration enforcement appeal}}.
|
Template:Arbitration enforcement/Archive navbox
Use this section to request clarification or amendment of a closed Arbitration Committee case or decision.
- Requests for clarification are used to ask for further guidance or clarification about an existing completed Arbitration Committee case or decision.
- Requests for amendment are used to ask for an amendment or extension of existing sanctions (for instance, because the sanctions are ineffective, contain a loophole, or no longer cover a sufficiently wide topic); or appeal for the removal of sanctions (including bans).
Submitting a request: (you must use this format!)
- Choose one of the following options and open the page in a new tab or window:
- Click here to file a request for clarification of an arbitration decision or procedure.
- Click here to file a request for amendment of an arbitration decision or procedure (including an arbitration enforcement action issued by an administrator, such as a contentious topics restriction).
- Click here to file a referral from AE requesting enforcement of a decision.
- Click here to file a referral from AE appealing an arbitration enforcement action.
- Save your request and check that it looks how you think it should and says what you intended.
- If your request will affect or involve other users (including any users you have named as parties), you must notify these editors of your submission; you can use
{{subst:Arbitration CA notice|SECTIONTITLE}}
to do this. - Add the diffs of the talk page notifications under the applicable header of the request.
Please do not submit your request until it is ready for consideration; this is not a space for drafts, and incremental additions to a submission are disruptive.
Guidance on participation and word limits
Unlike many venues on Wikipedia, ArbCom imposes word limits. Please observe the below notes on complying with word limits.
- Motivation. Word limits are imposed to promote clarity and focus on the issues at hand and to ensure that arbitrators are able to fully take in submissions. Arbitrators must read a large volume of information across many matters in the course of their service on the Committee, so submissions that exceed word limits may be disregarded. For the sake of fairness and to discourage gamesmanship (i.e., to disincentivize "asking forgiveness rather than permission"), word limits are actively enforced.
- In general. Most submissions to the Arbitration Committee (including statements in arbitration case requests and ARCAs and evidence submissions in arbitration cases) are limited to 500 words, plus 50 diffs. During the evidence phase of an accepted case, named parties are granted an automatic extension to 1000 words plus 100 diffs.
- Sectioned discussion. To facilitate review by arbitrators, you should edit only in your own section. Address your submission to arbitrators, not to other participants. If you wish to rebut, clarify, or otherwise refer to another submission for the benefit of arbitrators, you may do so within your own section. (More information.)
- Requesting an extension. You may request a word limit extension in your submission itself (using the {{@ArbComClerks}} template) or by emailing Template:Clerks-l. In your request, you should briefly (in 1-2 sentences) include (a) why you need additional words and (b) a broad outline of what you hope to discuss in your extended submission. The Committee endeavors to act upon extension requests promptly and aims to offer flexibility where warranted.
- Members of the Committee may also grant extensions when they ask direct questions to facilitate answers to those questions.
- Refactoring statements. You should write carefully and concisely from the start. It is impermissible to rewrite a statement to shorten it after a significant amount of time has passed or after anyone has responded to it (see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines § Editing own comments), so it is often advisable to submit a brief initial statement to leave room to respond to other users if the need arises.
- Sign submissions. In order for arbitrators and other participants to understand the order of submissions, sign your submission and each addition (using
~~~~
). - Word limit violations. Submissions that exceed the word limit will generally be "hatted" (collapsed), and arbitrators may opt not to consider them.
- Counting words. Words are counted on the rendered text (not wikitext) of the statement (i.e., the number of words that you would see by copy-pasting the page section containing your statement into a text editor or word count tool). This internal gadget may also be helpful.
- Sanctions. Please note that members and clerks of the Committee may impose appropriate sanctions when necessary to promote the effective functioning of the arbitration process.
General guidance
- Arbitrators and clerks may summarily remove or refactor discussion without comment.
- Requests from blocked or banned users should be made by e-mail directly to the Arbitration Committee.
- Only arbitrators and clerks may remove requests from this page. Do not remove a request or any statements or comments unless you are in either of these groups.
- Archived clarification and amendment requests are logged at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Index/Clarification and Amendment requests. Numerous legacy and current shortcuts can be used to more quickly reach this page: